President Obama handed the debate to challenger Mitt Romney on a 
silver platter, and few noticed it happening. Pundits debated the finer 
points and kept count of  body and face blows. They were looking for 
signs of a technical knockout and missed the fact that Obama lowered his
 guard for an upper cut that left him dazed on the canvass.  When he was
 led to his corner, he still did not know what had happened.
 
This was to be a debate on foreign policy – Obama’s supposed 
strength. Instead, it turned into a replay of earlier debates on the 
economy —Obama’s weak suit, and Obama fell into the trap.
 
Some  trivia enthusiast needs to do a word count, but I reckon about 
one quarter of the debate was on the American economy with Romney on the
 attack and Obama on the defensive. The foreign policy context opened 
the door: Without a strong economy, America cannot have a strong foreign
 policy.
 
In watching focus groups after the debate, that is exactly the point 
viewers took home: Obama gave us a weak economy and thus weakened us in 
 the international arena. Romney promises to fix our economy. He has a 
plan, so it is time for a change. The message is as simple as Johnny 
Cochrane’s “If the glove don’t fit, acquit:” Romney: “Weak economy 
equals weak foreign policy. Fire Obama.”
 
In a huge tactical blunder, Obama himself  interjected the economy into what was supposed to be a foreign policy debate:
go to forbes.com
 
 
An astute observation!
ReplyDelete