Donald Trump was near the bottom of my candidate choices
during the primaries. I was among those who thought that his intemperate
remarks would spell the end of his campaign, but they did not. That his
campaign consisted of a few slogans rather than policies disturbed me. As
someone who follows the Kremlin’s perfidy closely, Trump’s offhand praise of
Putin was more than disturbing and elicited warnings from me. As a committed small-government
conservative, I worry that Trump’s instincts do not mirror my own. In a word, I
am an unlikely Trump voter, but come November I will pull the Trump lever
without hesitation. I consider my
reasons rational and want to share them in this forum.
My reasons for voting for Trump:
First, there is no doubt that a Clinton regime will nominate
Supreme Court justices who meet the demands of her extreme left-wing base. With
a Supreme Court dominated by proponents of a living constitution, the
protections of the Bill of Rights and the final check on an out-of-control
executive will be lost and lost for decades.
Second, although Trump is a high variance candidate, we know
that Hillary Clinton is dishonest, a known liar and, through the email scandal
and Clinton Foundation’s wheeling and dealing, she places personal interests
above national interests. If Putin has
her emails, we could have a president subject to Kremlin blackmail. Trump may
have blemishes in his background, but none compare to Hillary. Where she anyone
other than a Clinton, she would be under criminal indictment.
Third, Trump’s foreign policy cannot be worse than Hillary’s
failed years as Secretary of State. He has stated clearly that his foreign
policy will be dictated by the national interest, not by the Obama-Clinton “citizen
of the world” approach.
Fourth, Trump is correct in promising to solve the
free-rider problem with America’s allies. If NATO countries are not willing to
contribute their fair share to the common Trans Atlantic alliance, they should
suffer the consequences. Hopefully, Trump will allow for a designated transition
period to give NATO members time to contribute their share.
Fifth, Trump has tapped into mainstream America’s
disenchantment with Washington’s domination by special interests. The American
people understand our national politics are broke and that both sides of the
aisle are complicit. The people understand the problem is not a lack of cooperation
but of corruption. A Clinton administration would mean even more of a broken
Washington. Trump will have to battle the odds, including many in his own
party, to make the basic changes in Washington that the working people of
America want.
Sixth, economists of virtually all persuasions, including
myself, favor free trade. Thus my initial reaction to Trump’s attack on trade
(much of which had the wrong target such as exchange rates) was negative.
However, one needs only to read the business-page headlines (such as China’s
deplorable treatment of Apple and banning of American chicken) to see that
Trump’s call for fair trade is not without merit. We do perhaps need better
negotiators to achieve fair trade, and Trump might actually improve free trade in
the end.
Seventh, if a nation does not have control of its borders,
it is no longer a nation. Nations must determine who they wish to enter the
country for work and eventual citizenship. Most wealthy countries, like the US
and Europe, need immigrants for their labor force and economic growth, but the
choice of whom to admit should be determined by sensible rules, such as
admitting very large numbers of highly skilled workers and entrepreneurs. Who
gets into the United States should not be determined by unguarded borders,
human traffickers, and family relations. America’s high school drop outs
understand what Washington does not. Open borders drive down their earnings. We
know that Hillary would not pursue a “rational” approach. Trump has promised he
will.
Eighth, Trump has street-fighter instincts that the
Republicans’ last two presidential candidates lacked. John McCain refused to go
after Rev. Wright and Bill Ayres, and Mitt Romney insisted on playing the role
of gentleman candidate. The Democrats can only be beaten by a candidate who is
able to outpunch them. It is important that Trump’s attacks not be sui generis,
but should focus on specific weaknesses, like Hillary’s sullied history and her
failure as secretary of state.
Ninth, Trump has done the conservative and Republican causes
a service by attacking political correctness and media bias head on. He has
shown that fighting back rather than cowering in a corner or trying to place is
the only way to deal with the twin curse of media bias and political
correctness run amok.
\
My reservations about Trump include:
First, he has not demonstrated an ability to run a viable
general-election campaign. To do so, he must focus on the opposition and not on
fellow Republicans. On important policy issues, he should keep his mouth shut
until he has thought through his positions with competent advisors.
Second, I do not know the depth of his anti-government,
strict constitutionalist convictions.
Third, he must demonstrate that he is willing to do the
study and work which is required to be a viable national candidate.
But my Trump reservations are minor relative to the
alternative. Rational voters have no choice but to look at the alternative. On
this, Trump wins hands down.
go to ricochet.com
