President Obama promised that the Affordable Care Act aka Obama Care
would eradicate the national scandal of tens of millions of Americans,
largely poor, without health insurance. A supportive media bombarded a
sympathetic American public with woeful accounts of poor mothers and
sick children suffering without medical care. The European press derided
a barbaric American health-care system that left the poor out in the
cold. A widely-cited Harvard Medical School study found some 45,000 deaths a year caused by the lack of health insurance. If Harvard says so, it must be true.
Surprise and Shock! According to the government’s own and most
authoritative study, Obama Care will leave 30 million Americans
uninsured during its first decade. Thirty million is a far cry from the
universal coverage the President promised. Another pledge down the drain
along with “if you like your doctor, you can keep him. If you like your
insurance, you can keep it.” I have not heard the press reminding us of
these broken promises.
go to forbes.com
Paul R. Gregory's writings on Russia, the world economy, and other matters that he finds of interest.
Showing posts with label uninsured. Show all posts
Showing posts with label uninsured. Show all posts
Friday, February 22, 2013
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Krugman’s Malarkey: “Death by Ideology”
Paul Krugman argues in his Death
by Ideology that “lack of insurance is responsible for thousands, and
probably tens of thousands, of excess deaths of Americans each year.” Romney
and Ryan, he claims, “want to repeal Obama care and slash funding for Medicaid
— actions that would take insurance away from some 45 million nonelderly
Americans, causing thousands of people to suffer premature death.” Moreover,
any plan to replace Medicare by vouchers “would deprive many seniors of
adequate coverage, too, leading to still more unnecessary mortality.” And what
if the amount of money in a “voucher care” program were not enough to buy a
decent policy? Krugman lectures that “going to the emergency room when you’re
very sick is no substitute for regular care, especially if you have chronic
health problems.”
It would be good if Krugman did a little gathering of facts
before he writes. If he had read my Krugman’s
Sick Numbers, he would know that there are virtually no uninsured poor, that
most of the uninsured are relatively young and can afford health insurance but
choose not to. For them, health insurance is simply not a good deal. He seems
not to know that those who substitute the emergency room for a regular
physician are primarily those on the government Medicaid program. They are insured
but few medical care providers want the measly fees the government offers them.
As an economist, Krugman should know that the real question
is not whether there would be enough money in a voucher program “to buy a
decent program.” Instead, he should ask, based on developing experience,
whether government health insurance programs offer providers enough money so
that they do not have to treat the government insured at a loss? If this is the
case, the poor will not be able to get a doctor. Judging from the emergency
room visit statistics, that is exactly what is happening.
Could it be that government insurance is “death of ideology?”
Labels:
death by ideology,
Medicaid,
Medicare,
New York Times,
Paul Krugman,
uninsured,
vouchers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)