In
its Libya Warnings Were Plentiful, but Unspecific, the New York Times broke
its four day embargo on the use of the word “Benghazi.” Those expecting a discussion of a
possible cover up by the administration and the curious sticking to the “video
story” were due for a disappointment. The article was exclusively about
security arrangements and the difficulty of gauging the security threat to our
embassy facilities in Libya.
American voters know about the changing administration
accounts in the month following the Benghazi
attacks and are curious. They must look elsewhere from the Times to get
answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment