Op-ed writer Ross Douthat is a rare truth teller among the New York Times’s writers’ stable. Columnist
Paul Krugman spouts daily left-wing fact-uninformed economics. Token
conservative, David Brooks, pens trivia about the latest book he read. Maureen
Dowd jokes about women’s issues. Only Douthat questions the Times’ ueber-liberal party line and tells the truth.
In his Sunday
October 14 Mystery
of Benghazi, Douthat dissects why “White House
officials continued to stress the importance of the ‘hateful’ and ‘disgusting’
video, and its supposed role as a catalyst for what Susan Rice, the ambassador
to the United Nations, insisted was a spontaneous attack” even as “it became
clearer that the Benghazi violence was an al Qaeda operation” --- a narrative “pushed
on Sunday morning programs, on late-night talk shows and at news conferences,
by everyone from Rice to Hillary Clinton to the president himself.” Per Douthat: “When Obama spoke at the United
Nations shortly after the attacks, the video was referenced six times in the text; Al Qaeda was referenced only once.”
Douthat, for the first time on the pages of the venerable Times, clearly lays out the time line of
what he terms the administration’s “strange denial” that the Benghazi consulate
attack was a planned terrorist action.
Douthat rejects two common explanations for Obama’s “self
defeating strategy,” before coming up with his own.
go to forbes.com
Watching Nancy Pelosy on Charlie rose is very revealing and instructive.
ReplyDeleteDes Moines Register's editorial board formally backed Mitt Romney'a bid for the presidency.
ReplyDeleteIt was the first time in 40 year this paper endorsed a Republican.