Most kids remember their first trip to Washington
all their lives. Proud parents, their children in tow, visit the
monuments, Arlington Cemetery, and other sights, but the highlight will
always be the tour of the Capitol and the White House.
President Obama has opted to deprive American kids of this lifelong
memory because the sequester cuts, which he describes as drastic, leave
him without funds to offer tours of the White House. Sorry kids, the
President says: “I tried hard to get the Republicans to adopt a balanced
approach, but they wouldn’t budge. They had to protect Big Oil and
corporate jets. You are left holding the bag. I can see you standing on Pennsylvania Avenue peeking through the locked gates. Sorry.”
go to forbes.com
Paul R. Gregory's writings on Russia, the world economy, and other matters that he finds of interest.
Showing posts with label OMB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OMB. Show all posts
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Sunday, April 8, 2012
The Tea Party Already Saved Taxpayers $300 Billion (Maybe a Half Trillion)
A “counterfactual” is an analysis of “what would have happened if.” President Obama’s claim that “the stimulus added as many as 3.3 million jobs” is the most famous example of this genre.
Counterfactual analysis of the effects of the 2010 election on federal spending can be executed, unlike the jobs-saved analysis, on a more solid foundation with nothing more than a pocket calculator. The procedure is simple: First, we find what the Obama administration intended to spend in 2011 and 2012 on the eve of the November 2010 election (and not knowing that an electoral disaster lay in store). Second, we compare these figures with what was actually spent in 2011 and what is likely to be spent in 2012. For example, if the administration planned to spend $3 trillion in 2011 but actually spent $2.5 trillion after the Republicans gained the House, the “counterfactual saving” for 2011 is $.5 trillion.
go to Forbes.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)