“What is motivating (Obama) primarily is ideology. And an
ideological opening. He doesn’t like the malefactors of great wealth. He
wants to “spread the wealth around.” Peggy Noonan
Anyone who dares to characterize Barack Obama as a leftist radical is heaped with scorn and outrage. Only crazy, hateful talk-show entertainers like Rush Limbaugh
stoop so low, but reasonable people do not listen anyway. Whether Obama
harbors socialist views is a valid topic for intellectual conversation,
but, other than errant bloggers (Is President Obama Truly a Socialist?), polite people avoid it.
Many moderate Republicans bought into the media narrative that Obama
is a centrist, who moves left only to placate his base. Were it not for
them, the true Obama would govern from the center, or tilt only ever so
slightly to the left.
Indeed, the carefully scripted Obama masterfully masqueraded as a
centrist during his two presidential campaigns, while governing from the
left. The complicit media characterized him as a softy, too ready to
yield to the obstructionist Republicans. But if the Left would only
“Watch what I do, not what I say,” Obama already delivered for them the
moon, and now wants the stars as well.
go to forbes.com
Paul R. Gregory's writings on Russia, the world economy, and other matters that he finds of interest.
Showing posts with label positive rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label positive rights. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
The Times Jumps In To Carry Justice Ginsburg’s Water
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg got herself into hot water, when she recommended to Egypt not to use the U.S. Constitution as its model. These are not politic words from a Justice of the Supreme Court carrying the weight of upholding the Constitution on her shoulders. She, like President Obama before her, seemed not to like the absence of “positive rights” in our Constitution.
The New York Times wasted no time in rushing to Ginsburg’s rescue with its ‘We the People’ Loses Followers. This page-one article reports the obscure research of two law professors to be published in June, that shows that constitutions written in the postwar period have become less like the U.S. Constitution with the passage of time. The Times article even dredges up a 1789 letter from Thomas Jefferson saying that constitutions naturally expire at the end of nineteen years.”
I must say, they circled their wagons quickly. We can’t let middle America think we do not like the U.S. Constitution.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)